Patients’ preferences for coronary revascularization: a systematic review

Página do item simplificado
dc.contributor.authorMagliano, Carlos Alberto da Silva
dc.contributor.authorMonteiro, Andrea Libório
dc.contributor.authorRebelo, Amanda Rebeca de Oliveira
dc.contributor.authorPereira, Claudia Cristina de Aguiar
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-06T13:37:31Z
dc.date.available2022-09-06T13:37:31Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.description.abstractAims: Current recommendations regarding the best treatment option for coronary revascularization are usually based on composite outcomes that were not selected or weighed with patients thence they may fail in representing patients’ preferences adequately. This systematic review aimed to appraise existing literature surrounding stated preference (SP) regarding coronary revascularization. Methods and results: Studies related to SP regarding coronary revascularization were searched on Medline, Embase and Lilacs databases. Two reviewers screened all titles independently, and consensus resolved any disagreements. Of 735 total citations, six studies were included and qualitatively synthesized. Notably, the attributes most often cited in these studies coincided with those already used in clinical trials (death, myocardial infarction, stroke and redorevascularization). Half of the studies analyzed the use of composite endpoints and showed the necessity to review this practice since the attributes are weighed differently, and there is a disagreement between patients and physicians. Also, a large variety of methods were used to elicitate and value the attributes such as rating, ranking, standard gamble, willingness to pay, and discrete choice experiments. Conclusion: Despite a large number of studies comparing revascularization treatment efficacy, there are just a few focusing on patients’ preferences. The selection of outcomes to be considered in the trade-off between treatment options and how to weigh them properly, taking into consideration patients’ preferences, need to be explored in future trials.en
dc.identifier.citationMagliano ASM, Monteiro AL, Rebelo ARO, Pereira CCA. Patients’ preferences for coronary revascularization: a systematic review. Patient Prefer Adher 2019;13 29-35. Doi: 10.2147/PPA.S188268.
dc.identifier.otherDOI: 10.2147/PPA.S188268
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.inc.saude.gov.br/handle/123456789/204
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherPatient Preference and Adherence
dc.subjectAngioplastia transluminalpt
dc.subjectAngioplastiapt
dc.subjectPacientept
dc.subjectRevisão sistemáticapt
dc.subjectCoronary revascularizationen
dc.subjectBypass surgeryen
dc.subjectPercutaneous coronaryen
dc.subjectTransluminalen
dc.subjectAngioplastyen
dc.subjectPatientsen
dc.subjectPatienten
dc.subjectSystematic Reviewen
dc.titlePatients’ preferences for coronary revascularization: a systematic reviewen
dc.typeArticle
Arquivos
Original bundle
Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
thumbnail.default.alt
Nome:
Magliano CAS, Monteiro AL, Rebelo ARO, Pereira CCA_2019.pdf
Tamanho:
202.81 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descrição:
Baixar
License bundle
Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
thumbnail.default.placeholder
Nome:
license.txt
Tamanho:
1.71 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed to upon submission
Descrição:
Baixar
Coleções
Produção Bibliográfica
Produção Docente
Produção em Conjunto com Discente